Author Topic: D.O. Vs. Baster  (Read 3340 times)

danduhman

  • Guest
D.O. Vs. Baster
« on: September 01, 2006, 09:53:34 AM »
I dont know if this has been talked abought here before but what is the difference between a baster and a dutch oven ? I have a #10 lid with the pattern mark A 2553 which shows to be a d.o. lid but says tite top baster the bottom has a pattern mark of 835A which shows to be a #10 d.o. both have slant trade marks both fit together well but I am not shure if their a match so what do I have a baster or a d.o.?

Steve_Stephens

  • Guest
Re: D.O. Vs. Baster
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2006, 05:02:33 PM »
Daniel, there is no difference between a Baster and a Dutch Oven.  I think that when Griswold introduced the basting rings on their dutch oven covers they came up with a new name to tout the basting feature.  Perhaps, after a short time of up to a few years, a return was made to Dutch Oven as most people probably knew the name of that pot to be a dutch oven.  Only my guess on the name change.  

As far as matching your top and bottom have a look at my Cast Iron Cookware News here on the site somewhere as a PDF.  On page 91 (June 1991) is a short article about dutch ovens/basters and slant/block TMs and what goes with what.

Covers came with Baster or Dutch Oven and with the slant TM.  Bottoms also came with Baster or Dutch Oven on them and with block TM.  I'm not sure if the bottoms came with Dutch Oven and slant TM.  My conclusion is that it's very possible that Griswold did mismatch Baster and Dutch Oven parts (top and bottom) and slant and block TM's on a piece.

Any pattern number listing that says a pattern number is for a "Dutch Oven" might also mean that the same number is for a "Baster" also since the same p/ns were used for both of the 1920 patented versions.

Steve

danduhman

  • Guest
Re: D.O. Vs. Baster
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2006, 05:33:05 PM »
Thanks steve I have had the pot for a while and I always wondered if it was a mismatch now i know that it probably is not they work fine together I am guessing that mine is one of the earlier ones as the bottom just has the slant trademark and the word erie and a pattern #. And as far as going to the pdf and reading your article it was not nessary i just reached over to my book shelf and dusted off my original copy! hows that for handy?

danduhman

  • Guest
Re: D.O. Vs. Baster
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2006, 05:39:46 PM »
I meant to say it probably is a match [smiley=crazy.gif]