Author Topic: No#20 skillet  (Read 14294 times)

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
No#20 skillet
« on: September 14, 2005, 08:02:14 PM »
Today I found a No#20 skillet with no markings. On earlier posts I heard mention of a Lodge #20. I was wondering is this how you identify them, no markings, or is there other No#20 skillets out there made by other makers? It is obvious this is an older pan and not a copy. If it was a Lodge what would be the value of a pan like this?

Offline Roger Barfield

  • Moderator
  • Regular member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8622
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2005, 08:47:53 PM »
http://cgi.ebay.com/MONTANA-SIZE-CAST-IRON-SKILLET-20-INCH-DIAMETER_W0QQitemZ6200220391QQcategoryZ976QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Mark, I think this was a Lodge #20 that was on ebay a while back.  I think they normally go between $100- $150.
As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.

loebster

  • Guest
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2005, 09:26:51 PM »
I think there is a new manufacturer makeing 20's now out of the country. The quality will of course be much lower than a Lodge or Griswold. If the quality is good it probibly is a Lodge.   http://cgi.ebay.com/Cast-Iron-20-Cooking-Skillet-BC7438_W0QQitemZ4405333969QQcategoryZ46273QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem  

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2005, 10:18:23 PM »
Greg, I drove through you town today on the way back from work. The pan is your friends that owns the barber shop. I seen it today in his booth. Thanks booth of you for the information.

Steve_Stephens

  • Guest
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2005, 11:52:33 PM »
Mark, I don't remember how the Lodge 20 skillets are marked but I'd look for a "Made in USA" and/or the letters "SK" on the bottom or, even, "20 INCH"  or maybe just "20".  I want to give you lots of choices on what to look for.  They are a close copy of the Griswold pans and decent quality.  Original price was around $70 in the 1980's.

Steve

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2005, 12:11:53 AM »
Thanks Steve for the information but this pan has no markings on the bottom but it looks exactly like the Griswold #20. I don't know how to I.D. them either but it is fairly good casting. I looked for a raised letter or a sunken Lodge logo, nothing. I was wondering if Wagner made some of these that weren't marked?It's just the casting looks to good to be a later cast piece.

Steve_Stephens

  • Guest
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2005, 02:59:56 AM »
I wouldn't be too surprised if Wagner did make some unmarked 20 skillets but I just don't know.  Didn't they mark in some way (even with a small letter somewhere) most or all of their regular sized pans?

Steve

Troy_Hockensmith

  • Guest
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2005, 09:07:57 AM »
THe Lodges I have seen all had Made in USA on them and the #20. Not to say this might not be one.

Offline Roger Barfield

  • Moderator
  • Regular member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8622
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2005, 11:01:19 AM »
The ones made after Griswold was sold say 20 inch skillet on the bottom.  I've seen some on ebay, but it's been a while.
As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.

Offline C. Perry Rapier

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 26158
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2005, 03:49:04 PM »
Quote
The ones made after Griswold was sold say 20 inch skillet on the bottom.  I've seen some on ebay, but it's been a while.

We talked about this very topic once. Somebody, and I've seen them, had a 20 and it had what I would call Griswold lettering on it, and 20 inch etc. etc. We concluded that it was an unmarked Wagner made by Wagner on the Griswold pattern, of course after Wagner took control of Griswold. This particular item looked in every way to be a Griswold (WAGNER) except the words of what they said.

loebster

  • Guest
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2005, 06:52:33 PM »
I'll try and rember to ask him what it is. I'm sure it's a decent pan if he bought it. He'll most likely know what it is as he has been collecting for a long time and has all the books etc. to look it up if he didn't know. He has a nice collection. I don't know if you had seen it, I thought you said you had. He collects higher dollar stuff than I can afford, plus he has been doing it for alot longer.  He was teasing me at Burley thought that I bought quite a bit of Griswold last time. But the prices were good. Normal I go for gate marked stuff or I am looking for Iron mountain etc..

I am trying to put together sets of unmarked users with heat rims. older stuff from the 50's or later and a few gate marked pieces. I really like the real old wagner, but it is harder to find it in good condition.  Plus I want heat rimmed Griswold, but it is harder to come across it for reasonible prices. a piece here and there.  

But I buy a lot of older unmarked lodge as it is pretty reasonible and they are good started pieces for that reason. The quality is there, it just doen't have all the nicer markings people generaly collect.  Plus you do get the people with a pile of old Iron that has a few good pieces mixed in and you can get the whole pile pretty cheaply. So I am ussualy dragging home a pile of rusty stuff that has a pretty low value. But it's a good way to learn about Iron. And sometimes when you take off the layers of junk you find a nice pan.

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2005, 10:26:55 PM »
No Greg, I haven't seen all of his collection, just what he has on display and that is pretty impressive. I think I just keep missing you both at Burley Park, but I guess that I am to busy looking for cast iron to notice much else. I have stopped at his shop the last three times I have passed through but he wasn't there. Maybe one of these times we'll meet up. Say hi to you friend for me.

loebster

  • Guest
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2005, 01:24:45 AM »
Mark,

I talked with him, and he is unsure if it is a Lodge or not. But it is a nice old pan. Sorry I couldn't get it identified further for you, but he doesn't want to say it's a Lodge and have it turn out to be something else. Probibly if you are looking for  a good user it will work as well as a Griswold. And if you decide some day to buy a Griswold, you will be able to get your money back out of it.

I have a new 17" Lodge and it is big enough for me for now.  I would like to have a # 20. But it is a little more than I can spring for one right now. Someday I'll get one. But I am haveing a hard time storeing what little Iron I have right now. It is just piled all over. Time to build that addition... Or get rid of some other less important stuff.

Offline Ed Allspaugh

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 3570
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • LOOKING FOR IRON !
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2005, 09:38:42 AM »
Quote
Quote
The ones made after Griswold was sold say 20 inch skillet on the bottom.  I've seen some on ebay, but it's been a while.

We talked about this very topic once. Somebody, and I've seen them, had a 20 and it had what I would call Griswold lettering on it, and 20 inch etc. etc. We concluded that it was an unmarked Wagner made by Wagner on the Griswold pattern, of course after Wagner took control of Griswold. This particular item looked in every way to be a Griswold (WAGNER) except the words of what they said.

 Clark and I, seen one over the weekend it read "CAST IRON SKILLET" at the top, at the bottom it read "20 inch". In the center you could see the ghost GRISWOLD  T/M.  $400 price tag.
Gray Iron-- Old as antiquity, new as tomorrow.

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2005, 01:30:43 AM »
Well, here it is.

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2005, 01:35:40 AM »
Second picture.

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2005, 01:41:17 AM »
Last one. What do you think of it? I know it's dirty and I plan on cleaning it but I don't see any markings where they should be.

Offline Paul Beer

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 1570
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2005, 10:46:00 AM »
Mark, I have three just like this and I believe they are all Lodge...If I can remember right I think I bought two of them in the 60's from our Farmers Co-op and all they carried was Lodge. They are great pans...users...can sure feed a group. Mainly use for breakfast meat etc....poached eggs in beer one time for 20 guys...made potatoes effus....great for sausage and bacon....big omletes and mexican eggs...Have fun with it.. Paul

Offline Mark Ritter

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: The heartbeat of collecting cookware!
Re: No#20 skillet
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2005, 11:58:55 AM »
Thanks Paul. I thought it was probably a Lodge and was just trying to get some information from others that might have this kind of pan. I guess that answers my question and now its back to cleaning pans.