« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: #2 gem pan  (Read 3474 times)

Offline Susan Salsburg

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • Karma: +0/-0
#2 gem pan
« on: December 06, 2015, 03:46:10 PM »
I posted on Face book but I'll ask here also: anyone recognize this pan? Age and/or maker? Only mark is an incised, script 2. Get an error message when I try to post pix.
Logged

Offline Susan Salsburg

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2015, 10:04:32 PM »
Renamed files
Logged

Offline Jim Glatthaar

  • WAGS member
  • Regular member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2013
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • WAGS: Heartbeat of Cast Iron Cookware Collecting
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2015, 11:14:17 PM »
I can't help with an ID, but that pan looks really old 8-)
Logged

Offline C. Perry Rapier

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 26152
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2015, 03:25:57 AM »
Hello Sue. What does the back look like now that you're all dialed in on posting them pics?   :) ;)
Logged

Offline Susan Salsburg

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2015, 06:02:36 AM »
No marks that I can see
Logged

Offline Harry Riva

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 4355
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Retired and trying to keep Molly happy
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2015, 09:34:19 AM »
Susan Do you have a picture of the top? The handles resemble Waterman or R&E but so do a few unmarked pans.
Harry
Logged

Offline Susan Salsburg

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2015, 01:39:22 PM »
Harry - scroll up to first pix.  The script 2 is where Waterman or RE should be.
Logged

Offline Harry Riva

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 4355
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Retired and trying to keep Molly happy
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2015, 11:24:22 AM »
Hmmm. I would swear that top picture didn't show up in my first peek. I've never seen a 2 script like this one.
Harry
Logged

Offline Susan Salsburg

  • Regular member
  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: #2 gem pan
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2015, 02:22:56 PM »
Cleaned up decent. Some casting flaws/roughness but expected for the age. Still think the script #2 should ring a bell but I'm coming up blank.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »